Peter Rushforth comments

Results 147 comments of


                                            Peter Rushforth

Questions about <layer checked>

How would you tackle it?

Questions about <layer checked>

I understand, but if it's only about what the attributes are named, and not what they do, what would be better names?

WGS84 gcrs vs. pcrs

@joanma747 👀

Support linked data (e.g. for physical accessibility)

Thanks for these comments. As a way of protecting the future project from problems due to intellectual property considerations, please consider joining the [W3C Maps for HTML Community Group](https://www.w3.org/community/maps4html/), which...

Support linked data (e.g. for physical accessibility)

> So… Should we include RDFa directly in the standard? If so, which version? https://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-lite/? I strongly endorse the minimum viable complexity that will work for your use cases approach,...

Questions about UA-provided controls (<map controls>)

> Is there any indication about whether web developers would be satisfied with using UA-provided controls for maps? We haven't done developer surveys, if that's what you mean. On the...

Set the opacity of a <layer> via CSS

I thought those SVG property specific attributes were unloved. I know *I* always am confused by them. Maybe @AmeliaBR has an opinion on this?

Idea: <map draggable> (or other) attribute (with a better name)

> OTOH we should be careful not to overload (and ) with declarative mechanisms. Words to live by. I also think of this in terms of how much we are...

Separate the Use Cases and Requirements into a separate document from the MapML spec

I hope the Web standards community will see enough in MapML that it can become, if not a standard as such, at least the kernel of a place to start...

Update contexts in which some MapML elements can be used

@Malvoz How should this be specified, in your view? I guess a first step might be to integrate the `` and `` spec into this spec, and then decide. WDYT?