Peter Rushforth
Peter Rushforth
> perhaps this is out of scope and better orchestrated by WICG or a W3C/OGC Working Group Maybe not out of eventual scope, but certainly out of my knowledge base...
Curious about what to say about the [`` ](https://maps4html.org/web-map-doc/docs/elements/map-caption/) custom element's accessibility mappings in the spec (can't link to it yet because editing).
It bears thinking about; there are cases where the input and select are presented to the user in the layer control, and so should be labelled. OTOH location inputs are...
Actually I believe there should only be a getter for extent, no content attribute. The extent / bounds of a feature should be defined or created/set by the feature's geometry,...
Kind of frustrating that HTTP and support by browsers is progressing faster than this proposal. That said, it's always a pleasure to delete code.
I have questions that probably stem from not understanding the security issues here. Bear with me, please. > There are two cases: > > * MapML document loaded from ``...
@zcorpan We recently completed a feature on the mapml-extension that allows it to intercept responses to top-level contexts (tabs) that are returned with the `text/mapml` content-type, which is then "wrapped"...
I think that area is extended in that it creates a "layer" of a single feature using map coordinates, but the only time you would use it would be where...
> It seems a bit problematic that `` is supposed to be active in both scenarios, because it means that the author must use feature detection to remove/hide any ``...
No, oversight.