Peter Conrad
Peter Conrad
Btw, number 48 may have already been assigned to STEALTH, please coordinate. @ryanRfox ?
What exactly do you mean with "obvious and serious problem"? How can the assignment of a sequential number be a "serious problem"? Or that someone considers this a joke? And...
Because the person who was assigning BSIP numbers happened to be one of the authors. Again, how can the simple assignment of a sequential number be a "serious problem"? And...
Please explain how assigning a serial number effects "personal gains".
I understand that the ideas presented in BSIP-83 are not well-received by all community members. However, I fail to see how the assignment of a number *in itself* can hurt...
The only BSIP that was passed quickly was BSIP-76. BSIP-83 was being discussed in public for two weeks before being merged. The only things which would affect cn-vote (i. e....
For reference: https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/539
Well-written, but unfortunately these BSIPs are all incomplete. Can you give us a status update, or a timeline how you plan to proceed?
This adds unpaid bloat to the blockchain. Clients can already embed a `custom_operation` with arbitrary data into their transactions. This can be bloat as well, only the client has to...
Comment from @abitmore in #40: > * The specification of BSIP's should be determinate, wording like "Possibly allow" is not acceptable. > * I don't think committee should have the...