Paul Dicker

@t-mart Thank you for the report. We had an issue and closed PR related to the problem of some specifies accepting a variable number of digits without look-ahead: #560 and...

> In general, the parse algorithm does not appear to backtrack to find another possible match location. This is an understandable compromise. Allowing for this case would essentially be implementing...

> The main difficulty is that we support iterating over the format string while iterating over the input string. So we currently don't know the next formatting specifier while parsing...

Fox expectations: this is something that is not an easy fix that can be done in a couple of hours of work (at least it is not easy for me...

@botahamec Do you want to push this PR over the finish line? Please adjust the commits a bit more matching @djc's request, and adjust the type of `MICROS_PER_SEC`. Note that...

> Note that we will hopefully merge two PRs the next few days that touch surrounding code: #1337 and #1385. You may want to wait with rebasing until that is...

@botahamec Can you let us now if you are still interested in working on this PR?

Closing due to inactivity.

Can this issue be closed now that the `clock` feature into `clock` and `now` (#1343)?

Thank you for reviewing! > There were a few memory allocation changes from pass-by-reference to pass-by-copy (and back). I didn't track those through-full, but in the compiler I trust. Yes,...