Old Dip Tracker
Old Dip Tracker
> I am not sure why this would crash like that (it is supposed to be detection -> graceful shutdown telling you to use -reindex). Maybe we lost some code...
Alright. So there's an issue that the linter doesn't catch with `numerus`. When we delete the numerus form in favor of a single form, the compilation breaks. I'll add that...
There are 2 new issues: - delete `numerus="yes"` from line 577 - delete `numerus="yes"` from line 601 After that I propose freezing it for review, so this has a chance...
Added `help wanted`: this could use a sanity check by a native speaker.
No worries. If it doesn't make it in, we simply rehang it to the next release 1-on-1 and get a relaxed timeframe to get it in. No reviewers generally means...
Let's move this one to the next release. This buys time to get a good review in.
Additional finding from #3260 that I forgot to mention: `contrib/devtools/security-check.py` does not support `arm64-darwin` at this time, so we will incur some tech debt until we port in fixes from...
Not in that exact form (we have Bitcoin script, not EVM) but you can probably hack together optimistic rollups today (but I wouldn't recommend it, it will be very hard...
> What are the main goals of 1.21? The goal is updating the codebase safely to a point where we can propose protocol improvements without being scared of unforeseen consequences,...
I think this is a (partial) duplicate of #3313?