Old Dip Tracker
Old Dip Tracker
To my knowledge only the dependency scope was fixed, not the functional test false positives.
I've tested performance for all tests that were edited between this PR at f9cd19f6b8 and 1.15.0-dev at 497c6026fc (except random tests as that's new) on an M1 with Apple clang...
> If this is closed then please close the issue. I think the issue is valid and I haven't seen any real discussion on the [1.14 PR](https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin/pull/2314). If the target...
> I saw this issue link and it seems that [it is] not resolved? It's not resolved for 1.14 yet, but it's solved in the 1.21 branch. Unfortunately, the 1.14...
> None of the nodes running with the new patched version 1.21.x That list isn't exhaustive, but yes, this is because it's not released, nor is it ready for release....
PS: I had to talk to GH Support to find out what happened to the related PR because there was nothing in the audit logs. Per support, the reason why...
- Qt 5.15 has some form of extended-LTS for a year and then we're on our own. I don't think it makes sense to port that in. - OpenSSL is...
I've been studying the Qt (LTS only, because non-LTS only has 1 year support) requirements a bit from the site @alamshafil mentioned above. | Version | End of Support |...
@opennota with which version was the old ~/.dogecoin directory created
I will try to reproduce this issue. I suspect the cause to be that with both the 1.8.0 and 1.10 releases, we forced a re-index, but I am not sure...