Max Held

yup this is important, people missed this during the presentation

This decision, if it ever comes up, is a bit awkward (potential conflict of interest) for me to be involved in, because I have done contracting work for RStudio in...

current idea is to deploy to azure as a container, if that works in #29 this is done.

I've now checked the big cloud vendors for suitable products for hosting our shiny app. I will check with the GWDG later, but first wanted to figure out the maximum...

Just for future reference: a couple of words on scaling. - Shiny users (i.e. people using the app at the same time) can share a single R process. - (In...

and one last general thought: obviously [RStudios Pro Products](https://rstudio.com/) (especially RStudio Connect in this context), self-hosted at GWDG or in a public cloud VM are also an option. I'm not...

re: Google Cloud Run, there still seems to be some debate: - https://github.com/randy3k/shiny-cloudrun-demo/issues/1 - https://github.com/MarkEdmondson1234/googleCloudRunner/issues/35 - https://github.com/rstudio/shiny/issues/2455

seems like with the currently (somewhat bloated container/app) we can get away with this: ``` resources: cpu: 1 memory_gb: 0.75 disk_size_gb: 10 ``` `vCPU` and `disk_size_gb` is at min already.

this is largely done now, documentation ongoing at https://github.com/subugoe/shinycaas Keeping open until I can point to that documentation

maybe use build stages.