Maximilian Roos

> It is documented as the API of the prql-compiler crate and I wouldn't promote it too much, because I often find something I want to change. BTW on reflection...

> What did you think of the idea to let users expand the list of supported functions? Yes! We have early support for modules & multi-file projects ([here's an example](https://github.com/PRQL/prql/tree/942886367e962e70a284df1826d38e73d5e1c274/crates/prqlc/tests/project),...

Yes, this moves us away from the SQL "standard" a bit, makes the generated SQL a bit less concise — but I'm a 👍 given the practical implications and theoretical...

Would be good to merge this!

In case anyone finds this helpful: We made an extremely hacky approach work for this sort of thing. While we don't have multiple repos, we want to compile code as...

FYI — in #2016 we test that the examples, after being formatted with the existing formatter, can still compile. Where they can't, the language in the markdown in the book...

FYI I deleted a couple of messages to keep the issue clean, I confused things. --- @aljazerzen I think for a Good "Actually First" Issue, I think this needs an...

(Thanks a lot. I added some thoughts to the broader point in #1840. Hope this isn't interpreted as criticism, am still trying to work out why we haven't been so...

That's what I had — but unfortunately `sqlformat-rs` messes up the formatting... (Something we should work out separately)

I've now updated the grammars — the only one not updated is the textmate grammar in `prql-vscode`