Maximilian Roos

Closing as not a great idea. We have one idea from the feedback here in #13 though!

FYI I coincidentally tried using `@overload`, but couldn't get it to work with `gufunc`s. If anyone has managed, that would be quite welcome. Until then, it's possible to access the...

I would have really liked to publish plain gufuncs. Unfortunately that's really not feasible for the main codepath — issues such as https://github.com/numbagg/numbagg/pull/216 means numbagg needs to intercept each call....

I hit I have an even simpler reproduction of this, no need for `sh`: ```yaml # Taskfile.yml version: 3 vars: bucket: '{{default "1" .bucket}}' # includes: # other: Taskfile2.yml tasks:...

A +1 for `if`. I really over-use `status`, which requires some mental gymnastics ("Only run this on ARM machines, which means status needs to be 0 on x86 machines, so...

> FYI #1220 has been merged Though IIUC this is a bit different — `for` rather than `if`?

> Right; I'm just saying this is ready for development per [this comment](https://github.com/go-task/task/issues/608#issuecomment-1614607328) Sorry, I didn't read up far enough. Thanks @JonZeolla

I think we can close this now — it's been implemented in the linked commit at https://bugs.python.org/issue41810. mypy no longer needs ignores, so those were just removed in xarray: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7343...

Someone would need to look more, but possibly this is hooking up [bottleneck's `move_rank`](https://bottleneck.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bottleneck.move.html#bottleneck.move.move_rank) in the same way bottleneck's other `move_` functions.

Does anyone have any short-term solutions for this? I'm running with 10K jobs, each with a pod, and it's becoming faster to use `kubectl` directly. I would be very happy...