Matt Wang

Now that we're under a GitHub organization, we can definitely make a new repository (or transfer jtd-remote) and then do what @kevinlin1 has suggested. For @just-the-docs/maintainers, any thoughts here? One...

> ... > I don't think it's suitable as a template for new users (which should be as simple as possible) but the `tests` collection from the theme repository should...

> Sorry, my previous comment was inaccurate: `tests` collections were included in branches of my fork `pdmosses/just-the-docs`, but not in releases. (I've now edited the misleading bits.) Not a problem!...

It sounds like we need a tiny bit more discussion to figure out the logistics of this repository, but it may be a good target for us to get to...

Hm, I don't have access to add users to our maintenance team. Other than that, I have no problem (or, to be honest, a strong opinion) with moving Michael's work...

Have continued a bit of this conversation in #892 - after initial thought, I think I'll trial using the new GitHub Actions deploy workflow. Feel free to comment there; if...

Similarly, PR welcome! Your approach seems reasonable to me.

Thanks for submitting this feature request. I'm not entirely sure how well this would work with the theme, but a PR is certainly welcome - we can review it then...

I think this is a good idea! One suggested approach is: 1. Create some snapshot tests files with the "correct" Markdown-rendered HTML 2. Build the site with `bundle exec jekyll...

Thanks @pdmosses, appreciate you taking point on this (I thought I'd have more time to give it a spin, but unfortunately I didn't). > I might develop a corresponding PR...