Matt Wang

I see, thanks for the clarification @nobodywasishere. Just to ask a follow-up: does [Jekyll's collections abstraction](https://jekyllrb.com/docs/collections/) describe the use-case for your pages? In that case, I'm thinking that we should...

Ah, yes - I haven't gotten around to updating the CHANGELOG with the current v0.4.0 notes (I've only left them in a draft section of the "releases" tab). I do...

Okay, @pdmosses I just updated the changelog with some new formatting, and have the file in `v0.4.0-dev` match what I believe are accurate release notes. Could you: - check if...

> Perhaps in future, PRs for new features and bug fixes should be accompanied by descriptions of how reviewers are supposed to test them? Yes, I think that's a great...

Hey, just triaging old issues; I don't think we'll support this feature writ-large, but I think you can use existing customization primitives to make this happen: - use a [custom...

Going to close this since, as @ivanskodje points out, #474 _should_ resolve your immediate ask (released in our new RC, `v0.4.0.rc1`!). I do want to respect Patrick's original intention in...

Just getting around to triaging all the PRs! I don't deny that this resolves the problem, though I think the bigger problem is that our Ruby version is now pretty...

Going to hold on this - I think merging in #820 will resolve this problem. @gabrielesh could you test with `main` when you have a chance to confirm?

@gabrielesh now that v0.4.0 is out, I think it _should_ resolve this problem. Let me know if it doesn't - feel free to reopen if necessary!

No worries, thanks for checking back in! Do let me know if you still run into this problem - want to make sure it works for your use-case!