Jacob Hoffman-Andrews

Did some more thinking and research in this Zulip thread: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-rustdoc/topic/caching.20for.20doc.2Erust-lang.2Eorg.20docs/near/262957610 --- For the stdlib docs on doc.rust-lang.org, here's the current situation for caching: everything is in S3, so it...

Thanks for filing!

By the way, I would also be supportive of the easier / less elegant approach, particularly if we downgraded the "check if your provider is supported" from a big red...

I'm in favor of (a)

I think this is done. The current version has a transparent background on the edges, but a white face, which seems like the right call to make sure the eyes...

FYI I started a Zulip thread to talk about the UI, and more importantly the expected use cases and tasks: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-rustdoc/topic/Version.20switching.20for.20std.20docs

Note: This is blocked by upstream promoting the devel branch to v2.

I was curious to see some examples of this problem and searched the Rust issues list: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+%22https%3A%2F%2Fdoc.rust-lang.org%2Fstable%2Ferror-index.html%22 A small handful: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101972 https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101880 https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101823 Interestingly, even though the filename/line combos (e.g....

I found these issues pretty enlightening: https://github.com/matklad/once_cell/issues/201 https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/72 In short, since once_cell intentionally chose a semver minor release, it is still possible for ureq to support Rust versions older than...

I think we cannot actually get rid of once_cell. We depend on it transitively via `ring`. I suspect our MSRV stance will mostly be dominated by that of our downstream...