Jonathan Lebon

> Back to topic, is this feature something that's worth to create a PR for it? Yup, definitely wouldn't be opposed to it! Do note that handling of actually opening...

> A major advantage of this approach is that change detection is trivial - we just look at whether the commit object has changed, whereas for an external directory it's...

This same issue also happens when running bubblewrap inside mock. I wrote a little compat script to make it work: https://gist.github.com/jlebon/fb6e7c6dcc3ce17d3e2a86f5938ec033 Of relevance to your (2): ``` # The parent...

> any reason we have the `hold` label on this? Probably because of: > Depends on: https://github.com/ibm-s390-linux/s390-tools/pull/154

Cool, thanks for filing this! I don't think we're quite ready to do this (since Fedora itself doesn't officially build for RISC-V yet), but I'm also excited for it. Have...

> and work on backporting it to older branches at our own pace. Once all backports are done, we clean up the old logic entirely from coreos-ci-lib. I talked to...

/retest

Pushed a trivial commit to fix the Prow CI issue. /approve /lgtm

I think the bug that was breaking CI here should be fixed by https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/1478. We just need to get https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/pull/3775 in, and then this should be unblocked.

I think we're still dependent on the legacy oscontainer for now. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-392 tracks its removal.