Geoff Bourne

I'm already using go-kit, so a solution using that would be preferable.

Yeah, I really like the idea of mc-router influencing the replica count of a server's statefulset. My only concern would be the amount of time in between and attempted connection...

Unlike bungee, etc mc-router routes only at the packet layer only for the handshake and backend resolution. After that it streams the connection without any awareness nor influence on thing...

I'm excited to see what you're doing here and was also starting to think that at least sniffing the frames would be more doable than I originally feared. I'll try...

Oh yeah, it was the encryption that was the show stopper before when I considered going deeper. I'm guessing that's partly why bungeecord recommends configuring the backend minecraft servers in...

...speaking of bungeecord, maybe we should look at how they handled that aspect. Maybe it is more MITM by generating its own server key, yet talks to the individual backends...

The simpler part is that you don't need to use SRV records when you're using mc-router. Instead just use plain old A records since mc-router is doing the work of...

The mc-router doesn't care if the referenced backend is a container or not. What output did you get during the attempted backend connection?

cc @Gabitzuu

@jemand771 it's currently PROXY v2, but I vaguely remember what you mean about some alternate client IP forwarding protocols for Bungee type scenarios. So it might turn out the particular...