Ian Howell

Hey @adrianchiris, after some investigation, I've found that the `pfNames` selector isn't sufficient for our use cases. I need to be able to target the device as it is named...

@e0ne Thanks for the review! I think I've resolved all of your comments. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do.

This is just for VF passthrough

Gentle bump on this one

I'm generating the SRIOV-DP configmap prior to the creation of any VMs. In my case, I'm creating a VM template which is then used by kubevirt to later generate the...

@SchSeba Any updates on this?

Hey @SchSeba, after some investigation, I've found that the pfNames selector isn't sufficient for our use cases. I need to be able to target the device as it is named...

@garethr The fix in 0.11.0 adding the `--ignore-missing-schemas` is insufficient. This [issue](https://github.com/instrumenta/kubeval/issues/149) demonstrates the unwanted behavior. This [PR](https://github.com/instrumenta/kubeval/pull/150) addresses the issue.

@garethr I couldn't actually confirm that these FormatCheckers are still required. Could you verify? If they need to be updated, I'll gladly take a look into doing so.

> I will review this PR sorry for the long wait @SchSeba Any update on this?