John Hendrikx
John Hendrikx
> @hjohn I guess it would be possible to make "bind" use strong references. But then we must do the same for the "normal properties". And doing that would probably...
@FlorianKirmaier > To my knowledge, many memory leaks, are not really possible to implement elegantly without weak references. For that reason, I usually come from the opposite direction, and ask...
@mstr2 would this PR make it impossible to keep more than 2 properties in sync with each other? Bidirectional bindings previously allowed for this, and I can imagine some use...
As per the discussion on the mailing list (https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2022-November/036707.html) we've decided to go for `when` as the name for the new method in `ObservableValue`. I've created a CSR now: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297719
@andy-goryachev-oracle @mstr2 would one of you be willing to review this one as well? It should be close to its final state now.
> The API and docs for `ObservableValue::when` look like they are in good shape, so I'll review them next week. > > My only overall comment is that this PR...
> I think that `ObservableValue.when` is good to go, but the case for `Node.shown` seems less clear. > > Applications might want to bind the active scope of an `ObservableValue`...
> In order to move this forward, please revert the changes in `javafx.graphics` and file a follow-up Enhancement in JBS that we can use to separately discuss adding such a...
> > I'm fine with doing a fix, but I need to know which one. Avoiding NPE's and silently doing nothing is IMHO not very desirable as this will give...