Christoph Hasse

Interesting, it installed `omfit_classes==3.2024.9.2` but failed. Will investigate

@kalling Where would I be able to see/check if a new `omfit_classes` is deployed or if a potential error was encountered? (to avoid bugging you here 😅)

@kalling yep just reran the tests and they now all pass 🎉

@zanieb apologies for the slow reply, it's been a busy work week so far. I've made the suggested change and added a test for the preview to make sure the...

@orso82 Thanks for the pointer. I'll try to find some time to investigate this, but it will have to wait until I have some more idle time.

@orso82 would you mind adding the `enhancement` label to this issue to avoid it going stale? (I don't have the rights to do so)

@gpshead, even just a confirmation whether google tooling currently enforces a specific order would be useful.

Thank you @vapier 😊

@ocefpaf originally used python 3.11.9 and tested with the latest numpy at that time and the latest pre 2.0 and both triggered the warning. I can still reproduce it with...

I can reproduce with numpy 2.1.2 as well: > ... they should be compatible That's fine for me for a one-off usecase, but this is exactly the kind of uncertainty...