Fabian Neumann

closing in light of #1857

LGTM! Do we somewhere have a test for `get_switchable_as_dense`? That might be good to add if it doesn't exist. Otherwise, good to go from my side.

For any config restructuring, we need #1547 first.

@TimFuermann, do you have an MWE which fails? With a fresh install today, the reproducible example worked without problems.

Closing because it doesn't reproduce with current versions.

related #643

This is the intended behavior that you can use 2030 biomass potentials for 2050 runs.

Alright, I think I got it now. Will you do the adjustment we talked about, using planning horizon as key and ENSPRESO potential year as values in the `config.yaml`? Then,...

For now, I decided to go with this option: > At the very least, we could document a little better right now that different time resolutions for elec-only and sector-coupled...

> I think if it is load weighted and the load is zero we should drop them. I think equal weight would be slightly better, but dropping also ok.