David Radley

> We should include it as flink has nightly ci that check jdk17 build also. Otherwise this pr will broke ci pipeline. @reswqa thanks for the clarification :-)

@reswqa I have backported the test code as requested.

@reswqa I have done the same for the [1.19 backport ](https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/24742)

@flinkbot run azure

@reswqa I am seeing errors in the CI junits - like it is not using the -e option in some other tests. Investigating.

@reswqa the CI output shows that the config.yaml is not picked up. This was moved into the base test calls by the fix. On the face of it it looks...

@reswqa all clean now. I did not backport the 1.19 change at that method was not there at 1.18. I was hoping that I could backport commit 06b3708 which introduces...

Hi @reswqa , ok that makes sense - I will close this pr.

@reswqa As discussed please could you merge

Hi @borislitvak @EcaterinaL , thanks for the changes - I cannot merge this as I am not a committer. I notice the branch has conflicts. I have suggested this be...