David Radley

@kristoffSC @grzegorz8 I have coded this in [https://github.com/getindata/flink-http-connector/pull/128](https://github.com/getindata/flink-http-connector/pull/128). Sorry I did not manage to keep you original commit @kristoffSC -f this is an issue I can redo the pr -...

I am happy to work on this. @kzarzycki

> Sure @davidradl ! If you needed help with lineage APIs and/or OpenLineage, our colleagues from Getindata actually implemented it, like @pawel-big-lebowski :) I will also help with getting reviewers...

> @davidradl I think we should be ready soon with the first version of job listener that converts Flink lineage into OpenLineage events. We'll bring more details during Flink Forward...

Shouldn't this pr go in after [https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/24618](https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/24618)

@tomncooper @MartijnVisser @AHeise I suggest we move to Kafka 4.0..0 client when we do Kafka connector v4 for Flink 2. WDYT? ( assuming we can sort out the tests) I...

@lajith2006 could you squash the commits please.

Reviewed by Chi on 12/12/24. appears that this PR is healthily progressing

@mxm @HuangZhenQiu my remaining concern is that if this parameter is not set correctly with respect to the checkpoint interval, there may be integrity issues relating to checkpoints being processed...

Hi @mxm, I am not an expert at this area - so was just asking the question. It sounds like the framework prevents any integrity issue. As I have no...