Daniel Sockwell

> All it would take, far as I can see it, is providing an auth with a high enough version to "hide" the "legitimate" one. Well, but the `auth` field...

My (perhaps incorrect/incomplete) understanding is that this behavior is correct and is a consequence of the way Raku allows nesting of compile times and run times. (E.g., `EVAL` is a...

I like this idea! One question (and it's really a question, not something I've formed an opinion on yet) is what language we should render the name in. Unless I'm...

In my view, these are all bugs – and should get much easier to solve with Raku AST (`.assuming` really _wants_ to be a macro!) See [this stack overflow question](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66626104/what-is-the-difference-between-using-rakus-code-assuming-method-and-using-an-an)...

+1 to the idea of adding Rakudo's `Parameter.modifier` to Roast. It's been present (and fairly stable) [since 2016](https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/231b898b722dbcc44b00c5d80909e742b68549d9), it's not marked as an implementation detail, and it's consistent with the...

> How does this not save on typing. I hate to say show your math, but by mine, 1) adds 2, not 14. I had that thought at first, too,...

Reading through this issue, it sound like there is general consensus behind the idea of adding support for validating sub-signature of a returned `Positional` or `Associative` with the same syntax...

@patrickbkr thanks for those quotes – they show that my initial PR message didn't do enough to explain how (we hope that) this solution is consistent with @coke's and @Altai-man's...

I haven't formed an opinion about whether Datish should have a .fmt command but wanted to provide a (partial?) solution for > There is no way to quickly format a...

Here's an update/summary of where we are with the Raku/Rakudo trademarks as of Sept. 24: Our long-term plan is to have The Perl Foundation apply for three separate marks: 1....