problem-solving
problem-solving copied to clipboard
Raku
Raku and/or Rakudo trademarks
TPF has filed for a trademark on "Raku" in the US. There were a couple objections raised by the trademark office (see https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn88782119&docId=OOA20200427#docIndex=1&page=1&tdrlink= for the letter).
One of the issues is that the raku website does not show the "raku software" available for download, only "rakudo". So in order to get the application approved we will need a download link or button that says "Raku" somewhere.
Do you know if it has to be software? I mean, we could point the link to rakudo, but it'd be close to cheating. A link to spectests would be more appropriate.
Alternatively, would it be ok if the link would point to a page with a list of implementations to download? Event though it'd be just rakudo on that page.
Do you know if it has to be software? I mean, we could point the link to rakudo, but it'd be close to cheating. A link to spectests would be more appropriate.
So the patent is for the name "Raku" in the area of "downloadable software". So yes, I think there needs to be something where you can "download Raku". And you might suggest a different area for the patent, but I spent a long time looking through the options and A) this is the best one; B) what we did for "Perl".
That said, I think that a link that points to Rakudo would be okay.
Alternatively, would it be ok if the link would point to a page with a list of implementations to download? Event though it'd be just rakudo on that page.
Great question, I have no idea. But I think we could try that and see what they say.
So the patent is for the name "Raku" in the area of "downloadable software". So yes, I think there needs to be something where you can "download Raku". And you might suggest a different area for the patent, but I spent a long time looking through the options and A) this is the best one; B) what we did for "Perl".
I think the above needs s/patent/trademark/g , since the two are not at all the same.
Alternatively, if "patent" is indeed what is intended/contemplated, then I'm very confused.
Pm
Alternatively, if "patent" is indeed what is intended/contemplated, then I'm very confused.
Nah, it seems like the usual confusion (trademarks vs patents vs copyright vs designs vs contracts). There is a Trademark Application. I have changed the title.
I do not think that this is an infrastructure issue. The first question we should be asking is whether “Raku” should be trademarked at all. It is actually right that trademarks can not apply to the name of the language itself but rather the compiler. Didn't they mean to trademark “Rakudo”? And if they wanted to trademark “Raku”, then why?
Also, as I'm reading this:
A display specimen for downloadable software (1) must show use of the mark directly associated with the goods and (2) such use must be of a point-of-sale nature. 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1). To show use of a point-of-sale nature, a specimen generally must provide sufficient information to enable the user to download or purchase the software from a website. See TMEP §904.03(a) (citing In re Azteca Sys., Inc., 102 USPQ2d 1955, 1957 (TTAB 2012)).
In this case, the specimen does not provide the means to enable the user to download or purchase the software from the website. See In re Sones, 590 F.3d 1282, 1286-89, 93 USPQ2d 1118, 1122-24 (Fed. Cir. 2009); In re Azteca Sys., Inc., 102 USPQ2d at 1957; TMEP §904.03(e), (i). Specifically, the only reference to downloading a program states that it is “RAKUDO” rather than “RAKU”.
I'm starting to wonder what kind of protections a Raku trademark will impose. For example, if I start new a Raku compiler, then create a website that has a user-friendly button saying “Download Raku now!”, will I be in violation? If yes, then I don't think it's right. If no, then what kind of protections is Raku trademark expected to bring?
I'm sorry to see that TPF did not realize the difference between Raku and Rakudo.
I'm not sure that one can create a trademark for a programming language. How does Python do this n with all of its alternate implementations? How is Python protected? Is PyPy trademarked?
I'm starting to wonder what kind of protections a Raku trademark will impose. For example, if I start new a Raku compiler, then create a website that has a user-friendly button saying “Download Raku now!”, will I be in violation? If yes, then I don't think it's right. If no, then what kind of protections is Raku trademark expected to bring?
The trademark imposes no particular restrictions other than what the trademark holder decides to impose. TPF would defer to the wishes of the Raku community in these matters.
The main benefit of the trademark is that it prevents someone from using the name and logo in a way that conflicts with community goals. For example, if someone were to make a "Raku compiler" that was actually a proprietary word processor, that would be a case where having the trademark would be useful. Without a trademark, there's literally nothing that could be done about this.
I think the Python Foundation's statement of "General Goals" at https://www.python.org/psf/trademarks/ is a good summary of how a language name trademark should be used.
How is Python protected?
With a trademark. See https://www.python.org/psf/trademarks/
From what I can see, PyPy is not trademarked, nor is Jython. That said, they could be.
I'm sorry to see that TPF did not realize the difference between Raku and Rakudo.
I'm not sure why you would assume this it the case. Trademarking Raku makes sense in the same way as we have a trademark for "Perl", and the same way the Python Foundation trademarked "Python".
We could also trademark "Rakudo", though I don't think this would have as much value.
I don't think the comparison to Python is as apt as a comparison to Lisp would be. That said, I don't know the legalities surrounding Lisp, so I'm afraid I can't be of much help.
the difference between Raku and Rakudo
Python is not a language definition, but an implementation. Therefore it can have a download button.
Perl is not a language definition, but an implementation. Therefore it can have a download button.
Rakudo is not a language definition, but an implementation. Therefore it can have a download button.
Raku is a language definition. I guess we could use a button to download roast?
@lizmat As it was said, a link to a list of available compilers could be fine.
@autarch Thanks to you and TPF for looking in to this.
I share the concerns expressed here on the language specification vs. language implementation difference, and think it's important the trademark is obtained on a solid foundation (it'd be a pity to get it, only to find this GitHub issue with all of its doubts shows up as a court exhibit later... :-))
The situation we have seems to be to be closer to, for example, the ECMAScript trademark, which is also a trademark relating to a language standard rather than an implementation. (Our standard is executable, but I doubt that makes a difference here.) Is it possible to find out the "basis" for that trademark? Perhaps they also do it as downloadable software, in which case I'd be quite reassured.
@jnthn Yes, here's the ECMAScript trademark - http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4804:ik71uw.2.1
And yes, it looks like theirs is in a different are. I think it may be possible to amend our application to use the same areas as theirs, which would make sense. I'll leave this issue open for comments for a bit to see if anyone objects or has other ideas.
Here's a link to the ECMAScript trademark which (I hope) will not expire - https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=85383290&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch
So I'm wondering if we should consider trademarking both Rakudo and Raku. The Rakudo name would be for downloadable software, and Raku as a language spec (using the same categories as ECMAScript).
I'll bring this up at the TPF board meeting this Friday, but I'd love some feedback from the Raku community on this too.
From my perspective, it's worth trademarking both.
Pm
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:13:29PM -0700, Dave Rolsky wrote:
So I'm wondering if we should consider trademarking both Rakudo and Raku. The Rakudo name would be for downloadable software, and Raku as a language spec (using the same categories as ECMAScript).
I'll bring this up at the TPF board meeting this Friday, but I'd love some feedback from the Raku community on this too.
-- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/Raku/problem-solving/issues/193#issuecomment-626901473
Having my own experience with trademarks in this area (I trademarked "Muldis"), I believe its perfectly reasonable to trademark "Raku", but it may be good to broaden it a bit to cover technical documentation, software, and services, rather than being so specific as "downloadable software". I also agree that a separate trademark for "Rakudo" should be gotten.
Hi all,
I've started with working an IP lawyer to do this properly. Here's what he suggested ...
A search of the USPTO acceptable goods database didn't retrieve any "computer documentation" entries. The closest entry I found is "downloadable documents in the field of .... provided via a website" Perhaps, "downloadable documents in the field of computer programming languages provided via a website"?
He suggests that we can use a screenshot of docs.raku.org as support for this. This makes sense to me. Do others following this issue agree?
As to Rakudo, how about adding a clarification that it implements the programming language to the specification used in the current Raku application, e.g. "Downloadable computer software for implementing an object-oriented, procedural, or functional programming language; downloadable computer software for use in developing, analyzing, coding, checking and controlling other computer software; downloadable computer software for use in cross-platform software application, software component, and web application development."
For this he suggests we use the rakudo.org home page as our supporting screenshot.
I think this also makes sense, but I had a couple additional questions for the Raku community.
I assume that we want to use Camelia as the trademarked logo for Raku, but please correct me if that's not correct.
Do we want to use the logo on rakudo.org in the trademark application for Rakudo? I think the alternative is to simply not trademark any logo.
Okay, further clarification. We are not trademarking the logos right now (we could do that later). Right now we're just trademarking the names, so I think I have everything I need to go forward.
My apologies, but I wasn't clear enough. I would register the logo. "Yes" meant to be "register everything". My point is that even if ever decide to modify the logo I'd protect the current one for historical reasons.
@vrurg No, you were clear. I was the one who was confused. I realized my earlier questions about logos weren't relevant to the trademarks we're filing for. If we wanted to trademark the logos that'd be a separate filing. It also occurs to me that since Larry drew Camelia (IIRC) that we should really have his blessing before we trademark that anyway.
Here's an update/summary of where we are with the Raku/Rakudo trademarks as of Sept. 24:
Our long-term plan is to have The Perl Foundation apply for three separate marks:
- A trademark on the word "Raku"
- An image trademark on the Camilla logo
- A trademark on the word "Rakudo"
Of these, we have only started working with an attorney for (1). The blocker on moving forward is figuring out the specific categories to apply for – we obviously want the broadest protection possible without risking invalidating the trademark. Prompted by @jnthn's comment upthread, we are currently planning to follow the example set by ECMAScript which – like Raku – is a software standard rather than an implementation. The ECMAScript trademark covers two classes: 009 (computer software) and 042 (design and development of computer software); we plan ask the attorney to seek both of these categories for Raku. It is possible that we may need to provide additional evidence to support the 009 classification, but we should be able to do so.
On (2), we need to check that no one has already trademarked Camilla. The text description of the Camilla logo states that Larry Wall holds both the copyright and trademark rights to Camilla. However, I've searched the USPTO trademark database and haven't found any indication that Camilla was registered (though I could have missed something). We've reached out to @TimToady to confirm the details.
On (3), I don't believe there's any real blocker, though it's possible we may need to as TPM's board for a bit more money (~$500) to cover the expense of registering an additional trademark.
After discussing the issue with the attorney we're working with, I believe we need take the following two steps to secure our trademark to "Raku". We need to act fairly promptly because our amended trademark application is due later this month.
1) Add a reference to Raku to the message displayed when Rakudo is launched
The attorney asked that the message "set the marks apart from the text by vertical separation and font differences and to include the TM symbol after each". They suggested a longer, four-line version, but we plan to suggest the following two-line compromise:
Welcome to Rakudo™ v2020.10 implementing the Raku™ Programming Language v6.d
2) Supply a translation for "Raku"
Because "Raku" is a word in Japanese, the Trademark Office requires us to provide a translation of the word, along with evidence of the translation or to agree to the translation that the Trademark Office found. They found the translation "easy" from Google Translate. However, my understanding is that our use of "Raku" has more to do with its meaning related to pottery. Based on that, I think we should submit the translation "hand-moulded, lead glazed earthenware pottery fired at low temperatures". (citation 1; citation 2.
We plan to reply to the attorney in a later today, so if anyone disagrees with either of these ideas, please say so as soon as possible. (The attorney won't file anything for a few days – and certainly not before we've updated the Rakudo message – so nothing will be final immediately but it would be better to limit the amount of back and forth over this as much as possible).
Other (non-essential) steps
I believe that the two steps above are all we need to do to secure our trademark. However, there are a few other changes that might be helpful, including minor changes to the website (e.g., using ™ in a few more places and changing some of the wording around the download options) and revising the 6.d specification announcement to reflect the name change. I plan to get started on PRs for these changes, but they don't need to hold up the trademark application.
(I've used the pronoun "I" in this comment because I'm speaking only for myself, but the rest of the TPF legal committee has also been involved and extremely helpful – especially Nigel Hamilton, who has been the main point of contact with the attorney and thus has taken on a large share of the work)
I think Larry actually intended both meanings to apply: the first about the use of the Raku Programming Language, the second on that, even though the language will have imperfections, it will nonetheless be beautiful and thus perfect after all.
@lizmat thanks, that's helpful to know. We'll ask the attorney if we can supply more than one translation. If we can only supply one, do you have a preference about which one we supply?
I would lean toward the second. But maybe @TimToady or @thoughtstream would like to chime in at this moment.
I swear I remember Raku name discussions also talking about "Rakuda", which is one possible Japanese word for camel. See https://jisho.org/search/%E9%A7%B1%E9%A7%9D and https://translate.google.com/#view=home&op=translate&sl=ja&tl=en&text=%E9%A7%B1%E9%A7%9D
I swear I remember Raku name discussions also talking about "Rakuda", which is one possible Japanese word for camel.
Yeah, I came across that too – for example, it was prominently mentioned in the HackerNews discussion around the rename. However, the request from the Trademark Office is specifically to provide translations of the term "Raku", so I don't think there's a good way for us to include statements about "Rakuda" in the trademark application.
(As an entirely separate matter from the TM application, it might be nice to have something in our FAQ about what the name means. We've (unsurprisingly!) got a lot of puns/linguistic shenanigans going on, and I'm not sure that new users appreciate all the layers of meaning)