Tue Ton

I agree that @iloveeclipse 's numbers are better than any numbers I could have produced myself. So I'll drop this PR to draft, pending closing it off later if necessary....

> I think we should evaluate an JNA based implementation as an intermediate solution until we can use FFM in order to avoid more compiled native binaries. Yes, I agree...

I've used the Eclipse SDK for Windows on Arm64 from the [latest I-build](https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops4/I20240723-1800/), but I don't notice much difference compared to other previous builds.

PR created.

@dreamjunjie > The version of dbeaver25.1 requires glibc version greater than 2.33, but the default glibc version for debian10 is 2.28, which makes it impossible to run dbeaver25.1 under debian10....

> 2. Build glibc2.34 and run dbeaver25.1. The glibc issue has been resolved, but there is a new problem indicating that a 'so' was not found. Yeah, it may be...

I haven't tried the OpenBSD, NetBSD, but I suspect they are all separate OSes, and not separate distributions of an BSD OS, as far as applications are concerned. Case in...

> as it seems to be common in the FreeBSD community to built the binaries from sources Yes, they rebuild all the binaries and re-package the software to their own...

Closing as there isn't a viable path forward for FreeBSD.

> Which JDK works on freebsd? > > https://adoptium.net/temurin/releases/ Not by Temurin. The FreeBSD team ports the OpenJDK releases and make them available as pre-built binaries to their `pkg` package...