Andrew Guibert

Currently the JSON-B TCK tests that EnumMap/EnumSet do NOT work, which I believe is an invalid test and JSON-B should in fact be required to support it. TCK issue: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/issues/103

+1 seems reasonable and straightforward to me

Currently the JSON-B TCK tests are housed in a different repo with the rest of the JakartaEE tests: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/tree/master/src/com/sun/ts/tests/jsonb After JakartaEE 8 I would like to migrate these tests into...

for the TBD standard exception, I think the existing `JsonbException` would suffice. In general, it can vary based on the deserializer developer what the outcome should be for an invalid...

Yes, I think the TCK test could be loosened a bit. RFC 2159 says that U+0000 through U+001F MUST be escaped, but the entire range (U+0000 through U+FFFF) MAY be...

hi @oliviercailloux, I agree that inviting Jackson/Gson would be a great addition to JSON-B, and is something I considered when first joining the JSON-B group. I've reached out the maintainer...

hi @oliviercailloux, does this issue fully capture what you are asking for? https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonb-api/issues/66 It would allow usage such as: ```java List myField; ```

JSON-B has Java 8 as a baseline prereq so I'm not concerned about avoiding Java 8 features. I agree the field-annotated approach is a bit more readable, but would this...

I don't see that example as a counter-example, you could simply do: ```java Map aMap; ``` Obviously I'm in favor of more concise approaches, but I think we need to...

hi @MartijnDwars, would you mind proposing a PR to clarify this in the spec?