UnaffiliatedCode

Sorry for the lack of clarity on the documentation referenced. In regards to my exact issue: Without the ".SetName" being used, the test name would follow: "...{Fixture Name}.{Method Name}.{Attributes}" in...

I appreciate the increased clarity on that page. However I believe there to still be a misunderstanding (possibly on my part) The line: ``` testCase.SetName("String used as name"); ``` Expected:...

> Standard Name Formats > Internally, NUnit uses certain standard formats unless overridden by the user. The standard format for generating a name from a test method and its arguments...

I appreciate the extra information. I'm not certain that this is entirely a 3.10+ issue with NUnit, however i can still replicate the previous Hierarchy behavior within the runner in...

Sounds good. I'll look into this direction when time is available. In the meantime, (if you have time) can you verify which direction this needs to go?

edit: minor update due to incorrect label on summary: "Test showing Corrected Structure from mockery SUCCEEDING"

Are there any plans to implement this?

I'll purge the unrelated discussion to make it clearer for history.

To be more specific, I'm not actually looking to change that case `singleCaseSwitch`. I'm looking to add the requirement that if this repository is going to have an opinion on...

Then wouldn't a documentation that says something like: ``` Justification: Readability ``` or any other pertinent information, resolve this request?