James Turner

It seems like this problem is meant to be this way for interfaces as Eric Lippert [points out on Stack Overflow](https://stackoverflow.com/a/39619053/1676444). Looking into `IOneOrMany` sounds good though as far as...

Oh - I saw the combined classes before but didn't realise that was because of multiple inheritance in schema.org. The only way I could see #13 resolved without interfaces would...

I'm happy to try making a fix for this - haven't dug into any of the code though to see how I would go about it (plus want to know...

Ahhh OK. I did look for existing issues about this but must not have had the right keywords or something. Looking forward to the next release then!

I cloned the develop branch and tested this (as that PR you referenced was merged) but it doesn't seem to work: ```csharp var expected = new A[] { new A...

If I was to have a guess at the problem, one difference between my example and the linked PR is that my base type I run `Should()` on is an...

Technically it is _both_. The code I've inherited uses `Items[0].Name` in the syntax @whymatter mentions because it wants to check only one item but that is broken as of v6.0.0...

Thanks for the feedback @mgoodfellow ! Everything you've said makes sense and is probably what I should do. Similarly doing it that method allows for integration with event counters too....

Thinking about this a little more, I'd probably go down the path of splitting cache layers into categories like: - Common (This is what already exists) - Counters (This is...

More-or-less, could expose it like so: ```csharp cacheStack.RefreshCache(cacheKey, valueFactory, cacheSettings); public void RefreshCache(string cacheKey, Func valueFactory, CacheSettings cacheSettings) { _ = RefreshValueAsync(cacheKey, valueFactory, settings, CacheEntryStatus.Forced); } ```