Micha Reiser

Thank you so much for this contribution. This will help us a great deal when adding support for other editors and I'm looking forward to your lapce extension!

@xunilrj what are your thoughts on this?

This is related to #3168 One point that this issue brings up that hasn't been covered by #3168 is that inconsistency between `rome format` and `rome check`. I don't have...

> I think that even if our grammar currently doesn't support decorators, these skipped tokens are still getting parsed as identifiers, and since the semantic model cannot precisely interpret what's...

Do we have an understanding why it regresses performance in such a significant way? Particularly because the benchmarks only test programs without ANY diagnostic.

> > Do we have an understanding why it regresses performance in such a significant way? Particularly because the benchmarks only test programs without ANY diagnostic. > > Personally I...

@sebmck would you mind providing some additional information about the issue? It could help us reproducing the issue and assessing its priority Reply from @leops > It would need to...

@xunilrj is this fixed by your latest changes to make rename an opt-in feature?

Thanks for reporting this bug. The message printed by the `init` command needs updating. You can use `rome ci` to test the formatting and linting of your files. There's currently...

> Just for my own curiosity, is that something that might change? I'm not aware of it but @ematipico knows better than me. > Another one I mentioned as a...