LinasKo

Hi @tc360950 :wave: Looking purely at the numbers, it's a massive improvement. I'll see if I can review it soon. Is this in comparison with the `develop` branch (`supervision==0.21.0rc5`), or...

Am I reading the graph right - is `cross_product` the most expensive operation here? (also given we're calling it frequently) Is that the main reason for transforming to a vertical-line...

@SkalskiP, when you're back - I'd like your input. I think this is a fascinating case where an issue is revealed, and the problem is solved, but with a method...

Thanks! To add more freedom, I'd say, implementations of `trigger` don't have to use the inefficient `calculate_region_of_interest_limits` and `is_point_in_limits` methods. If there's a significantly faster way to line count, we...

Hi @rolson24 :wave: Well done isolating the error and finding the root cause! What prompted me to dig for other solutions was the removal of `class_id`, boxes, etc. The algorithm...

I've added the NaN conversion at the point `IOUs` are calculcated. The same Colab as provided showcases the fix.

Hey @n0012 :wave:, I'll be helping @SkalskiP with this one. I can't reproduce it on `supervision==0.20.0` (latest release) or `superivision==0.21.0.rc4`. Which version are you using? You can find out by...

Glad it helped! Do bear in mind, this is a release candidate version. If you wish to keep up with the future updates, feel free to change the pip install...

Hi @SMUEric1127 :wave: Can you try `pip install supervision==0.21.0rc5` too?

That's good to hear :) I know we've had issues with `tracker_id` generation. If you're curious, feel free to compare the files in: `https://github.com/roboflow/supervision/tree/develop/supervision/tracker/byte_tracker`. Relevant tags are `0.20.0` versus `0.21.0rc5`....