LinasKo

Hi @westlinkin 👋 The code is well-structured and nicely documented, but I'm a bit unsure of its purpose. Granted, I didn't have much time to look deeper. The way I...

Hi @westlinkin, I've looked over the code and there's a few remarks. In short - assuming we fix the bugs, I see the upsides and how it addresses the problem...

@SkalskiP, what do you think? I'm leaning towards not including this in the repo. Overview: 1. The goal is, knowing how many objects we'd have, to show tracks for those...

I see! So it's in-field outliers that `MaxInstanceLimiter` eliminates... I've just found something that might help with the bug I mentioned previously. Right now, after, e.g. track `#2` disappears, it...

@westlinkin, final point; might help. [TraceAnnotator](https://supervision.roboflow.com/annotators/#traceannotator) has a `color_lookup` param. If you change to `TRACK`, it will give each different tracker a different color. Good luck!

Hi @Rizwanali324 :wave: What versions of supervision are you using? Would it be feasible to upgrade to a newer one? If you do upgrade, here's the changes you'd need to...

That is very old. I suggest the latest one - `0.19.0`.

Good to hear it worked! Happy to help with your problem as well :slightly_smiling_face: I see you're already doing `detections = detections[detections.class_id == 0]`. Can you explain in more details,...

I see the method for user selection - thanks. So there's one class at-a-time. Unfortunately, I won't have time to go through the paper :) Is the problem that all...

I'm having the exact same issue. The depth in `depthai_demo.py` does not appear. When running the `depthai-viewer==0.0.7`, it gives the aforementioned `'PlgSrcMipi' '985'` error. When accessing through the SDK, a...