LinasKo

@DrawingProcess, confirming half of it. You may start working after I check with @SkalskiP.

Hi @DrawingProcess, I spoke with the core team. It sounds like a useful change and your contribution would be most welcome. 😉 Please don't forget to include the Colab, as...

Hi @Lars-Codes 👋 Thank you for your contribution! Unfortunately, I can’t merge this PR due to the "Invalid Head Notebook In The Diff" issue. I did encounter the same problems...

@onuralpszr, you're very right that it needs a split. It's a massive file. Let's do that right after the next release, but merge this PR as is. (after I review...

I'm heavily in favour of 1. The steps for this would be: - [x] Find, learn of all places where `tracker_id` is used. - [ ] Modify the core of...

Example: line_zone.py:trigger() checks if iterating over `tracker_id` array produces `None` Related: Test case in #1206 checks it too.

Example: smoother.py:update_with_detections() checks if iterating over `tracker_id` array produces `None`

I was wrong about the `-1` case - the only issues that exist are unnecessary `None` checks. When the related PR is merged, this can be closed.

@SkalskiP, handing it over to you - happy to merge. With `self.minimum_consecutive_frames=1` this causes no adverse effects, but otherwise increases the chance that neither tracking nor detections will be shown...

Hi @Bhavay-2001 :wave: I haven't tried it myself, but this may work. ```python import cv2 import supervision as sv from ultralytics import YOLO model = YOLO("yolov8n-obb.pt") image = cv2.imread() results...