Benjamin Schaaf

@wbond thanks for confirming that. So it looks like we don't lose anything from doing "static linking" style imports. This would be my preferred approach to this as I'd argue...

I'd much prefer the second suggestion as it's much more explicit and works with multiple imports including a "diamond inheritance" situation. My suggestion would be to make imports part of...

My suggestion for this either: ``` number : '([+-])(?x: ([0-9]*) |(...) )'{0: sign, 1: whatever, 2: ...} ; ``` or ``` SIGN = '([+-])' SIGN_SCOPE = 'keyword.operator.arithmetic' decimal : '#[SIGN]...'{0:...

> By the way, would the (nonexistent) 'whitespace-strict' mode in Sublime syntax parser achieve the same? Sublime Syntax doesn't care about white space in any way; it's the same as...

> would still not be able to generate ↓ (which seems like the equivalent to regex?, but there could be an easy mistake, so it's still meaningfully different ) It's...

The issue with that workaround is that each "test" needs to happen serially, as I'm using a test runner that runs tests in parallel. What do you mean by software...

I had this same issue and solved it by installing docker from the official source. Ubuntu packages docker without BuildKit (buildx).

That does work, but creating a new metaclass for almost every single function call is not a tenable situation.

Does it happen in [safe mode](https://www.sublimetext.com/docs/safe_mode.html)?

What packages do you have installed? Note that reinstalling does not touch your installed packages. Refer to [this page](https://www.sublimetext.com/docs/revert.html) for reverting to a freshly installed state.