zwvista

@mwpowellhtx Yes, the reduce operator is just like the LINQ Aggregate without a seed. I had to choose another name because the selector version of the reduce operator has exactly...

@mrange Thanks for your detailed review, from which I've learned a lot. I'm not sure whether I have done a complete code coverage run of the new code. Simply don't...

@mwpowellhtx You don't really need a seed when you do summation or multiplication. For example, if you want to know the sum or the product of an array of numbers...

@mwpowellhtx Sorry, but I just can't get your point. Why do you think the end user should always tell aggregate what the seed is and not the other way around?...

@mwpowellhtx I'm sorry if I've misunderstood you. I'm afraid you have missed something. I don't need to provide the aggregate with a seed because it is already in cpplinq long...

In order to simplify the interface, I've removed the reduce operator and replaced it with a third overload of the aggregate operator. So now the aggregate in cpplinq is just...