Zviad Metreveli

Have you thought about a setup that just takes out misbehaving attestation nodes from the pool of nodes that can be selected as an issuer instead? So instead of a...

> That's a really good idea to protect the user experience @zviadm. I think this mechanism can work in conjunction with other incentive mechanisms. Without the incentive of slashing or...

Another example of positive enforcement: If we have separate rewards for attestations, later on, we can also adjust rewards based on successful attestations for each node. So now there is...

> @zviadm I agree that it'd be nice to untangle the incentives of running a validator and attestation service. This would also support non-validator attestation operators in the future. One...

> Just sent out a big update to the Attestation Service Incentives design. Appreciate all of the feedback that went into this. @zviadm a lot of this is riffing on...

> Hey @nategraf, apologies for missing the previous comment in the PR. I definitely think this idea is worth discussing, especially in light of the recent Twilio and Valora 1.11...

Do you prefer comments here, or in the notion doc that was shared before: https://www.notion.so/Multi-Currency-Support-06fffb1ecc0b429fa3682ba9843d5d19 ? (I left two comments on the notion doc, but can copy paste them here...

> Comment by @prestwich "Generally speaking, I'm in favor of this. I'd like to see more specification (should we follow the uniswap interface precisely? can we achieve the same guarantees...

Thanks for the comments everyone in todays call. As I understand we can separate discussion into two high level parts: 1. Should Mento allow regular trading between CELO/cUSD or not...

> I'd like to add a security consideration. Although in most respects attacks which can be done with a flash swap would be done without it given sufficient capital, this...