matt abrams

@stiang I saw and thank you! I'll start triaging some of the issues this week. Will look at the PRs too. more soon!

@stiang tested some of these PRs and they looked solid so I merged. Another added Node 18 to the GH action, which I was going to do anyway. Also closed...

@Loskir I would say that this is working as intended. if the idea is that escaping markdown would preserve the markdown syntax, then that is [the opposite of this issue](https://github.com/stiang/remove-markdown/issues/58),...

Hi! Thanks for submitting this. This does appear to be a bug. We recently changed the pattern for deploying databases on Railway. They are no longer plugins but services. I...

@iloveitaly sorry about the delays--I'm looking into this...

~~folks seem to like this proposal. Are you interested in finishing your PR? It looks like it's not quite done...~~

@iloveitaly also check this out: https://github.com/railwayapp/nixpacks/issues/1017#issuecomment-1839761192 maybe worth hopping on that thread? how would this PR interface with that solution?

@gabemeola how do you feel about the state of this issue? Should we add this to the nixpacks docs?

hi @jaiiye, thanks so much for making this issue. I've talked to the team and we've gone ahead and labelled this as a feature request. We are hoping some of...

Thanks for creating this issue, @sandersaares generally it is better to use Grafana's built-in time-macros for filtering by time: https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/datasources/azure-monitor/query-editor/#use-macros-in-resource-graph-queries have you tried these instead?