zhhyu7

> @zhhyu7 What is the intention of this PR? Does this PR fix a bug? @masayuki2009 Yes, is a bug fix. we use netutils/usrsock_rpmsg to supports cross core network data...

> Requestion changes: use a build setup as other platforms: > > * separate docker file and chip-build-vscode update > * make sure the SDK files are not a moving...

@andy31415 Please help review this patch, thank you very much!

> There may be some internal implementations that have not been synchronized to the community. @zhhyu7 @xiaoxiang781216 Please provide some help with this issue @anchao @linguini1 , It should be...

> > @anchao @linguini1 , It should be that no one has used the inline function in the `ieee80211.h` file before, so there is no similar error, have you added...

@anchao There is really no relevant function implementation in nuttx, help to see? Is it the influence of the gcc version?

> I'm confused about what's been removed? Is there no longer a netdev work thread? Why? Am I correct in thinking that users can't choose between HPWORK and LPWORK queues...

> sockaddr.sll_ifindex = if_nametoindex(ifname); > memset(sockaddr.sll_addr, 0xff, sizeof(sockaddr.sll_addr)); > sockaddr.sll_halen = ETH_ALEN; Done

> @zhhyu7 I noticed that the CAN documentation starts with wrong information: "NuttX supports only a very low-level CAN driver.", could you please fix it when updating the RST file?...

> @zhhyu7 I think it requires to update the Documentation https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/components/mm/index.html#i-o-buffers to include this new IOB initialization. Otherwise it will be Another Hidden Feature of NuttX (AHFN). OK, I will...