zhangyongjing

We can for sure define a common set of a11y attributes for UI components based on the reference implementations as listed above. For this we need to start the UI...

My two cents: We should stick to MiniApp(s) when referring to the specific standard technology we're developing in this group. 'mini app' could be used in the context of describing...

One more thing would be the URI scheme. We agreed to use HTTP based solution rather than defining a new `miniapp://` scheme. (The current draft needs to be updated though.)

Thanks for the comments. I agree the current packaging spec is not clear enough to address the issue above, even though we have reserved a section of 'i18n' for further...

>Is it possible for MiniApp packaging to leverage the existing discussions such as signed exchanges and Web Packaging? It's not feasible to reuse Signed Exchanges/Web Packaging (WPACK) for MiniApp since...

> Some parts of the FAQ need to be updated, but since we have a relatively complete FAQ now, I suggest that we close this issue and discuss the parts...

I think it's needed.

Hi, welcome to join the MiniApps WG/CG work. You can start with the translation, but it's not obligated. I'm thinking if it would be better to create a new document...

On the 2nd point, using an existing spec would be the best choice if it does fit. But I'm not so sure if the screen orientation events and APIs are...

> Can we consider exposing some DOM APIs to the logic layer so that MiniApps can make better use of JS libraries for the Web? And if we expose DOM...