Zev Averbach
Zev Averbach
To be more "for humans". 😄 Would you accept a PR implementing this?
Currently they fail silently, applying a "let everything through for the given folder" filter. Would you accept a PR fixing this?
At the very least test that all `Imbox` methods make the expected IMAP calls, to avoid unforced errors like #138 😳. (generated by yours truly)
... and add them! pending merge of #139.
pending merge of #139
For humans! Would you accept a PR accomplishing this in `Imbox.messages`?
[As seen here](https://developers.google.com/gmail/imap/imap-extensions). Happy to implement that for you if you think you'd be open to such a PR.
This would've saved me some effort today. Would you accept a PR accomplishing this?
Without setting up a build, I was able to get going more quickly with ```html ``` Maybe this would help others start playing with this more quickly? As another option,...
I assume it means "call for unit tests". Would you accept a PR implementing one of the above suggestions?