Zack McCartney

(sorry for spacing on responding) yuh! cool, thanks! I'll shoot to drum up something soon 🍹

@devinivy heyo! ran into some funkiness here due to signal-handling (or lack thereof) on Windows. To resolve, I'm thinking 1. Skip the test that exercises the newly added `SIGINT` handling...

@devinivy ah! jeez, yea, I completely spaced here! But I believe someone at my office has a fairly current Windows machine now, I should be able to test this out...

@devinivy i've done some tinkering with this while working through #38 and #39 , happy to take a crack at this one, too, if it feels worth it

Goes beyond the test cases, but here's a solution that also handles regular arrays (non-tuples) by returning `never` ```ts type Length = number extends Partial["length"] ? never : T["length"] const...

@MiroslavPetrik ah, yup, agreed `never` didn't feel quite right. That said, I think it's fair to take the stance that `Length`'s contract is providing a precise number only if it's...

Ah, cool, thanks for the post, will check that out. And sure thing, I'll get a PR over soon.

I just ran into this issue, or at least an issue that presents in the same way (hard-to-debug error, opaque references to virtual modules). Granted, first time using tanstack start...

@mcollina Any update on where redeploying the docs stands? I've been looking at fastify-vite as a starting point for my next project, between https://blog.platformatic.dev/exploring-react-ssr-with-fastify and docs in the repo, fine...