Simon Pieters
Simon Pieters
I think this should happen. It doesn't make sense to have vendor-prefixed APIs as the standard.
This seems testable as-is with wpt infra.
I can review.
Since `application-name` exists in HTML, I think this should be named `application-title` instead of `app-title` for consistency.
I think we can land this, see https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/7867#issuecomment-2893403198
I'm OK with waiting here until another browser has decided to ship. But yeah, it seems we should discuss the meta issue.
I've moved this to whatwg/dom
@karlt is correct. An `error` attribute on `HTMLSourceElement` would be more consistent. Though `source` is also used for `img` where this kind of information is not exposed (and the `error`...
> To give an example, authors can already use this workaround for "styling elements into existence," and they can do so without any concerns for a Flash of Unstyled Content...
I think this isn't currently testable in wpt. See https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/27873