Simon Pieters
Simon Pieters
The [WHATWG PR template](https://github.com/whatwg/html/blob/main/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md) separates "At least two implementers are interested (and none opposed):" from "Implementation bugs are filed:". Maybe something like that could help here?
As far as I can tell, no. cc @tabatkins @grorg
@mounirlamouri or @foolip are the flags here the same as when tests are run in your infrastructure? Is there some other flag that we're missing (generally, not specifically about these...
Also in https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/6426#issuecomment-557197345
@gsnedders > asked for review when the checks have finished (successfully or not) i.e. also ask for review when CI is failing.
I think something with heroku needed it, but don't remember what. @tobie @jugglinmike ?
A longer delay before reassigning (say 60 seconds) would be good I think. The bot could add a comment, but I think it's not necessary.
Interesting. That error was the reason for filing https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/13710 so possibly the guess (by @tobie) at the cause was incorrect. Maybe the code could retry after a timeout if the...
> Dunno if it's exposed through the API yet. https://twitter.com/natfriedman/status/1083076252615888896
OK, that makes sense. I agree we shouldn't make people reviewers automatically, only request review. The bot could ask one of the admins to update the reviewers team if necessary?