Yoav Melamed

Hi @amibar Do you plan to add .net 6.0 support on the next release?

**Hi Ami,** Just thought maybe it will be a nice improvement to replace some of the blocking code and having some async methods (such as 'await enqueue' or 'await WaitForIdle')...

Hi @amibar Sorry for the super-late response - I missed your comment :/ Yes, having an awaitable task in the queue will defiantly be a big step for STP It...

Hi @amibar The reasons from my end is to make every thread of STP the most efficient it could be: - Having an awaitable task so each thread of the...

Hi Ami, For you question > Do you use the WorkItemGroups to limit concurrency or use the STP directly ? Same as @MichelZ , I'm using STP in several projects...

Hi @amibar That looks like a great idea! I think that's exactly what @MichelZ and myself are looking for. I'm going to pull the `async` branch and take it on...

Hi @amibar After pulling the `async` branch and trying it myself, there is an issue I found with how the code is running: The `stp.Concurrency = 1;` has no effect...

> if I'm getting it right - the reason is we are not actually queueing the items, but just firing tasks. Am I right? > Did you notice this behavior...

Hi @amibar Sorry, maybe I got confused, so what are the use cases you think RunTask will resolve? Because as for now I thought it will be executed on the...

Hi @amibar Thanks for your feedback! I tried to re-run the sample above with the updated `async` branch, but the results were the same: When the `stp.Concurrency = 1` all...