Iakiv Kramarenko

consider not just "by contains" but also "starts with" and "ends with"... and even "matches to" (i.e. via regex)

Let's see) First, we need to figure out naming for all cases) Then implementation would be simple) On Wed, May 12, 2021, 16:30 Grinevich Dmitriy ***@***.***> wrote: > I'd like...

It's possible, but such feature will be "not for all". On many projects the implementation of Selects is custom. You will definitely need implementing your own wrapper on such projects....

For now I tend to choose the `JsClick(this SeleneElement element, int xOffset=0, int yOffset=0)` version, counting offset from the center

What about adding both: * JsClick(this SeleneElement element, int xOffset=0, int yOffset=0) version, counting offset from the center * JsClickWithTopLeftOffset(this SeleneElement element, int xOffset=0, int yOffset=0) or even also adding:...

Yeah, it's more verbose, very explicit:) But then "JsClickCenter" will not be fully consistent with a common webdriver "Click" Let's keep the "base" JsClick named same way as selenium webdriver...

Help wanted: needed a test for JsClick to verify that offset counts from the center... something like this: ``` // TODO: make it work and pass:) // [Test] // public...

So far the original Not condition class is made internal. I have also added `Condition#Not` property allowing to write something like `S("#foo").Should(Be.Visible.Not)`, yet keeping it internal... Guys, let's finalize the...

some cons that comes to the board – while having it as object - it will not be like that easier to automatically add using statements via Quick Fix support...

Unfortunately, integration will not give all benefits, e.g. "implicit waiting for indexed elements of collection" will not work because of the following algorithm of original selenium's PageFactory logic: page =...