Antonio Yang

Hi @dr-orlovsky, May I try this? It is not an urgent issue, I can take this chance to learn more, go through the Contract stuff, and make more test cases.

@dr-orlovsky Please be kindly reminded. This PR will go into `v0.11` not `master`, and solve the trivial CI issues.

Sure. I will open another quick-fix one if that is easier. I will be pleased to introduce Nix to you, once you have time. This Nix idea is the same...

[actions-rs](https://github.com/actions-rs) was marked as archived by an administrator on Oct 13, 2023. It is no longer maintained. They clearly announced, so we should find another solution. Nix is a good...

We can remove `DeterminateSystems` if this will be much easier to maintain in the future. I do not do a deep survey on `DeterminateSystems`, because it is just one of...

Yeah, other actions are updated, and this PR is not MSRV anymore. By the way, It allows failure to upload code coverage, we can set it back when the token...

@dr-orlovsky Please be kindly reminded. This PR will go into `v0.11` not `master`, and solve the trivial CI issues.

Hi @repi [Ignore](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68007) issue is listed in your __Should have__ section. There is a crate [test_with](https://github.com/yanganto/test-with) that helps you ignore test cases with conditions. Is it solve your problem? This...

Hi @repi Now `test_with` has a test runner and can check the condition on runtime. https://github.com/yanganto/test-with#runtime This may be a solution for you. If you have some condition not provided...

`struct-patch-derive` already use syn2 after 0.3.0 release