yacovm

Results 88 comments of yacovm

I think that instead of mimicking Fabric semantics in a complete manner, the strategy should be really deviating from Fabric by: 1. Restricting functionality of what you can do 2....

> The challenge is, though, that current trusted ledger architecture, besides validation of fpc chaincode transaction, relies on proper validation of (a) standard fabric channel definition with, e.g., msp and...

> Hmm, i don't think you can rely on this. If the trusted ledger doesn't validate the config-changes but just takes them at face value, a bad peer could create...

> Given that we need MSP-rooted signature verification, (subsets of) policy evaluation and the parsing of the protobufs elsewhere (and hence corresponding library functions), it's less clear how much complexity...

How did you redeploy? Did you backup the files of the orderer's file system or something?

I'm sorry but I don't understand what steps you followed. Can you be more clear and accurately describe everything you did?

But even without this abdication, if the leader is removed, the other two nodes should be able to select a new leader. The test, tests this property. so it should...

> > Hi @denyeart https://go.dev/ref/mod#incompatible-versions > > Do we have plan to referring this module name convention on module in format of `../v2` in next LTS 2.5 release? Fabric core...

> > > > > > > > > > Hi @denyeart https://go.dev/ref/mod#incompatible-versions > > > Do we have plan to referring this module name convention on module in format...