Chang Ye

Thanks @marcelm. Sound that solution 2 is more balance. YAML is also a good solution, but it will also create some complexity.

Hi, @marcelm. I would like to know if this feature is in the master branch now?

Hi @marcelm, I am thinking the API you mentioned in idea 4. It will be very interesting if the API can run in pipeline in the same way as what...

If there is such `{placeholdername}`, user can keep the cut_sequence in the read name. Maybe the trimmed part can be access in this way, `{adapter.n1}`, `{adapter.n2}`... n1, n2, ... are...

relative issue: https://github.com/marcelm/cutadapt/issues/437 https://github.com/marcelm/cutadapt/issues/443

Hi @marcelm, I am also thinking the implement of this. For those descriptive features, like read name (`{id}`), read comment (`{comment}`), adapter name (`{adapter_name}`), it is straightforward to defined one...

Hi @marcelm, I would like to know if this feature is still on the roadmap?

Thank you @marcelm

thank you very much. I found this argument in the document now. 😂 On Fri, Oct 1, 2021, 04:14 Marcel Martin ***@***.***> wrote: > Yes, you can use the anywhere...

HI @marcelm Is this issue solved?