y2s82

@rcurtin Can I take a crack at this? Seems like a good reason to go through the code and study it.

Checkout [this discussion](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7241993/is-it-smart-to-replace-boostthread-and-boostmutex-with-c11-equivalents). Also take a search for reference to understand the include statement.

Interesting. Could you clarify? This actually is two separate issues: - build without Boost, and - change build environment to not rely on bjam and repository-maintained custom Boost source code...

it currently builds on Travis CI's specific environment. Likely will fail miserably everywhere else. and even when compiled, @rdittrich97 told me that it seg faults. I'm trying to set up...

as mentioned in #16 , upgrading to Python 3 is one of the project's goals. Besides, Python 2.7 is quickly reaching EOL. We could, for now, rely on the Python...

Checkout [this discussion](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7241993/is-it-smart-to-replace-boostthread-and-boostmutex-with-c11-equivalents). Also take a search for reference to understand the include statement.

I am less than convinced on the idea of reintroducing boost library back into our repository. Can we instead make a good documentation and/or installation scripts for Windows developers to...

If you are interested in finding all boost libraries included in the current code base, try the following command in the bash environment (i.e. git bash): ```sh git grep '#include...

Which version of boost are you using? I left a comment on your PR, but the latest Boost seems to produce unexpected behavior (quits silently). This was observed in the...

[Based on this link](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14306797/c11-equivalent-to-boost-shared-mutex), it seems shared_mutex has an equivalent object in STL. Checkout [reference](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/shared_mutex)