Axel Beckert
Axel Beckert
Please add a (n)oping option to ping all IP addresses (i.e. both, IPv4 and IPv6) for given hostnames
> I suggest to use `-5` as it is between `-4` and `-6`, but `-a` or `-A` would be fine as well. Actually, in hexadecimal, `-a` or `-A` would be...
Please add a (n)oping option to ping all IP addresses (i.e. both, IPv4 and IPv6) for given hostnames
Hi, yay on progress here! :-) > Sounds like a great feature! Could you create a PR, @cron2? That would make it easier to test and review. Thanks to @cron2...
Please add a (n)oping option to ping all IP addresses (i.e. both, IPv4 and IPv6) for given hostnames
Since this still didn't make it into liboping proper and hence won't be part of the upcoming Debian 11 Bullseye Stable release, I wrote my own wrapper around `noping` as...
Please add a (n)oping option to ping all IP addresses (i.e. both, IPv4 and IPv6) for given hostnames
> Sorry about that! Would have been happy to cherry-pick that into the library if someone had poked me. Nah, don't worry. I actually would like to see this in...
The CVE id CVE-2013-2208 has been assigned to this issue.
This also has been reported in Debian at https://bugs.debian.org/739182
> But I need to fix everything for Python3, that's a bit of work sadly Yes and no. For me it currently suffices to use the HWRaid buster repo packages...
This can be closed now, but the Bookworm repo is still missing, see #139. ;-)
Hi, sorry for chiming in late. Did seem to have overseen the according notification and stumbled over the nick highlight just by accident. @rpodgorny wrote: > hmm, has this advanced/changed...
Hi, > Currently bpfmon is using a single data source - either pps/bps from iptables rule or pps/bps from libpcap rule. I see. > What you describe is requiring more...