x0r

Results 14 comments of x0r

You may also try ida/hex-rays (which I think is better but expensive) or https://github.com/xor2003/masm2c (which have instructions tested, but not fully compatible to 64bit) or facebook transcoder

"swift: /home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-4.0-package-linux-ubuntu-16_04/swift/lib/SILGen/SILGenDecl.cpp:798: auto (anonymous namespace)::EnumElementPatternInitialization::emitEnumMatch(swift::Lowering::ManagedValue, swift::EnumElementDecl *, swift::Lowering::Initialization *, swift::Lowering::JumpDest, swift::SILLocation, swift::Lowering::SILGenFunction &)::(anonymous class)::operator()(swift::Lowering::ManagedValue, swift::Lowering::SwitchCaseFullExpr &) const: Assertion `subInit == nullptr && "Cannot have a subinit when there is no...

@frranck /usr/bin/swift-build >>build.log [build.log](https://github.com/frranck/asm2c/files/1568035/build.log)

If I call test from DOSBox-X or Windows or Linux it does not crash. I if call from staging - it is crashing on div instruction. x86 instructions test (testi386.exe)...

So the instruction emulation is very good for staging. CMOV, CMPXCHB8 are not implemented. Maybe not required. [qemu_x86_instructions.zip](https://github.com/dosbox-staging/dosbox-staging/files/7548163/qemu_x86_instructions.zip)

Right these instructions (CMOV, etc) are not required for DOS software since provided for recent CPUs. What's why they are not yet in original Dosbox I think.

Fix: file TypeCode.cpp: method CORBA::TypeCode::equivalent (TypeCode_ptr tc) const May call operation "id()" only for types: for tk_objref, tk_struct, tk_union, tk_enum, tk_alias, tk_value, tk_value_box, tk_native, tk_abstract_interface tk_local_interface, tk_except tk_component, tk_home and...

You can try something like: ``` project.afterEvaluate { ['docker', ].each { String taskName -> tasks.named(taskName).configure { Exec dockerTask -> dockerTask.commandLine = ['sudo'] + dockerTask.commandLine } } } ```

Don't realy remmeber the implementation details but I think you can merge recognisers in a single regexp in reverse order. Let say recognisers are: a. , cd, ef, xy ```...