xinzhenQin

Thank you very much for your quick response！But I still wonder if I can make the corresponding changes in the QBMM version corresponding to of2016.

Thanks, I have run successfully on of2106 against the modified version. Thank you very much for your work. But I also found that sometimes the ODE solver reports problems that...

Ok, I'll put together a description of the problem and send it up here later today @AlbertoPa

I'm sorry, I think I'm having some architectural issues. For example, I couple the univariate populationBlanceModel with a solver, but the information of each order moiments such as volScalarField--"momnet.o.populationBalance" are...

thank you very much @AlbertoPa But this approach relies on creating a concrete PBE model object in the solver, which seems to contradict the mechanism chosen at runtime, although it...

Thank you for your work！@AlbertoPa

Since we can't currently handle the problem of abscissa less than 0 caused by negative growth rates, I chose to add a minAvscissa to avoid abscissa less than 0. When...