DivisionByZero

Results 208 comments of DivisionByZero
trafficstars

> 3. this is theoretically a pre-phase towards moving completely to only exported functions so in the (no so near) future we would like to have something like this: Ok,...

>export { branch, commitEntry, ... } I would not suggest exporting specific functions from the `index.ts` file since that can lead to side-effects and could potentially break tree-shaking. Just wanted...

> 2. we can now use "private"/"not exported" functions inside modules We can do this already. Not private, but I don't see a problem with the approach we have so...

Just so I understand you correctly. You suggest doing the following: ``` @MyDocumentationDecorator({ example: myJwtLib.generate(realPayload, secret, { expiresIn: dateInThePast }), }) ``` This is not possible for me because the...

I use this workaround for numeric enums: Workaround Source ```ts // options for custom decorator type ApiPropertyEnumOptions = { /** * Indicates if multiple enum values can be used as...

> @xDivisionByZerox can you provide info about how the progress of #1155 is going? > If you do not have the time currently, also let us know and someone else...

> Somehow some files are generated with fully new content 🤔 Oh damn. Good catch. I will revert those files. I guess they slipped through as I played with the...

Those "additions" should be reverted now. They happened due to those files being implemented in a dynamic/logical way, not with a static data set.

I understood this (`in case of entity`), as pointing out that a single entity (so not an array) is not saved as transaction, but an arry is. This thought of...

> How can I achieve this effect? The Swagger [specification does not support](https://swagger.io/docs/specification/data-models/enums/) this behavior. You might be interested in [this](https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-ui/issues/3873#issuecomment-345615713) comment from the swagger-ui repository. Thats the closed you...